Skip to main content
KDCompare

Cookies triple chocolat

Snacks & sweetsNewMarque Repère

E. Leclerc

€1.44

(€7.20 / kg)

In store

E. Leclerc, Nancy

Set price alert

Cheapest Cookies triple chocolat prices

1 price found

Sorted by total price incl. known shipping. Not all providers on the market are included; we may earn a commission from some retailers, which never affects the order. Prices may contain errors or be delayed – the price on the retailer’s site applies. How we compare

  1. E. Leclerc

    E. Leclerc, Nancy

    France

    Cookies triple chocolat

    Availability unknown

    Cheapest

    €1.44

    (€7.20 / kg)

    In store

Sorted by lowest total price. Offers without known shipping are listed after offers with a calculable total.

Similar products

Cookies triple chocolat – Price analysis

The Cookies triple chocolat price reported by E. Leclerc, Nancy on Nov 2, 2026 is €1.44. The lowest price in the selected period was €1.39.

CheapExpensive

Set price alert
Oct 14Nov 15
Lowest in period
€1.39
Highest in period
€1.44
Average
€1.42

Daily lowest total price observed in this market. Days without a calculable total are omitted.

Table view
DateLowest total price
Nov 15, 2026€1.44
Nov 14, 2026€1.44
Nov 13, 2026€1.44
Nov 12, 2026€1.44
Nov 11, 2026€1.44
Nov 10, 2026€1.44
Nov 9, 2026€1.44
Nov 8, 2026€1.44
Nov 7, 2026€1.44
Nov 6, 2026€1.44
Nov 5, 2026€1.44
Nov 4, 2026€1.44
Nov 3, 2026€1.44
Nov 2, 2026€1.44
Oct 27, 2026€1.39
Oct 26, 2026€1.39
Oct 25, 2026€1.39
Oct 24, 2026€1.39
Oct 23, 2026€1.39
Oct 22, 2026€1.39
Oct 21, 2026€1.39
Oct 20, 2026€1.39
Oct 19, 2026€1.39
Oct 18, 2026€1.39
Oct 17, 2026€1.39
Oct 16, 2026€1.39
Oct 15, 2026€1.39
Oct 14, 2026€1.39

Cheapest right now: €1.44 E. Leclerc →

Cookies triple chocolat specifications

Specifications have not yet been editorially verified.

General

Organic
—

Product description

Source / Kaynak: Open Food Facts & Open Prices contributors (data: ODbL, images: CC BY-SA)

Marque Repère – Cookies triple chocolat

EAN/GTIN:
03564706509863

Is everything correct?

⚑ Report a problem

More in this category